Abstract
In order to explore making incoherent probabilistic knowledge more applicable, we considered the approach of using mathematically precise probability to approximate set functions that represent incoherent subjective knowledge.The approximation approach has the advantage of being applicable to any kind of set function whereas other transformation methods are mainly restricted to a certain subclass. The projection method was developed for approximation using Euclidean distance. We analyze its advantages and disadvantages in comparison with normalization for additive set functions.Here, we present novel properties of both, the projection method and normalization. Thus, in the context of additive set functions, the question of which method is superior remains open, but with further arguments on both sides.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
