Abstract

An important feature of Bayesian statistics is the opportunity to do sequential inference: the posterior distribution obtained after seeing a dataset can be used as prior for a second inference. However, when Monte Carlo sampling methods are used for inference, we only have a set of samples from the posterior distribution. To do sequential inference, we then either have to evaluate the second posterior at only these locations and reweight the samples accordingly, or we can estimate a functional description of the posterior probability distribution from the samples and use that as prior for the second inference. Here, we investigated to what extent we can obtain an accurate joint posterior from two datasets if the inference is done sequentially rather than jointly, under the condition that each inference step is done using Monte Carlo sampling. To test this, we evaluated the accuracy of kernel density estimates, Gaussian mixtures, mixtures of factor analyzers, vine copulas and Gaussian processes in approximating posterior distributions, and then tested whether these approximations can be used in sequential inference. In low dimensionality, Gaussian processes are more accurate, whereas in higher dimensionality Gaussian mixtures, mixtures of factor analyzers or vine copulas perform better. In our test cases of sequential inference, using posterior approximations gives more accurate results than direct sample reweighting, but joint inference is still preferable over sequential inference whenever possible. Since the performance is case-specific, we provide an R package mvdens with a unified interface for the density approximation methods.

Highlights

  • In Bayesian statistics, unknown variables are given a probability distribution that specifies our knowledge about the variables

  • This can be done by directly reweighting the samples, or by approximating a functional form of the posterior distribution from the Monte Carlo samples

  • We have explored the use of several such approximation methods, and we found that they can allow more accurate sequential inference than direct sample reweighting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Bayesian statistics, unknown variables are given a probability distribution that specifies our knowledge about the variables. This distribution can be updated based on available data using Bayes’ theorem. An important advantage of this approach is that inference can be done sequentially; that is, when we have obtained a posterior distribution after seeing a first dataset, we can use this posterior as prior for inference with a dataset. Multivariate posterior distribution function approximations by the Gravitation program of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call