Abstract

BackgroundA challenging problem in current systems biology is that of parameter inference in biological pathways expressed as coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Conventional methods that repeatedly numerically solve the ODEs have large associated computational costs. Aimed at reducing this cost, new concepts using gradient matching have been proposed, which bypass the need for numerical integration. This paper presents a recently established adaptive gradient matching approach, using Gaussian processes (GPs), combined with a parallel tempering scheme, and conducts a comparative evaluation with current state-of-the-art methods used for parameter inference in ODEs. Among these contemporary methods is a technique based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHS). This has previously shown promising results for parameter estimation, but under lax experimental settings. We look at a range of scenarios to test the robustness of this method. We also change the approach of inferring the penalty parameter from AIC to cross validation to improve the stability of the method.MethodsMethodology for the recently proposed adaptive gradient matching method using GPs, upon which we build our new method, is provided. Details of a competing method using RKHS are also described here.ResultsWe conduct a comparative analysis for the methods described in this paper, using two benchmark ODE systems. The analyses are repeated under different experimental settings, to observe the sensitivity of the techniques.ConclusionsOur study reveals that for known noise variance, our proposed method based on GPs and parallel tempering achieves overall the best performance. When the noise variance is unknown, the RKHS method proves to be more robust.

Highlights

  • A challenging problem in current systems biology is that of parameter inference in biological pathways expressed as coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs)

  • We present a comparative assessment of parallel tempering versus inference in the context of gradient matching for the same modelling framework, i.e. without any confounding influence from the modelling choice

  • These methods are based on different inference approaches and statistical models, namely: non-parametric Bayesian statistics using Gaussian processes (GPs) (INF, LB2, LB10), splines-based smooth functional tempering (C&S), hierarchical regularisation using splines interpolation (RAM), and penalised likelihood based on reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (GON)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A challenging problem in current systems biology is that of parameter inference in biological pathways expressed as coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Conventional methods that repeatedly numerically solve the ODEs have large associated computational costs Aimed at reducing this cost, new concepts using gradient matching have been proposed, which bypass the need for numerical integration. A standard approach is to view a biopathway as a network of biochemical reactions, which is modelled as a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). This system can typically be expressed as: xs =. The type of regulatory interaction depends on the species involved, e.g., f may describe mass action kinetics, Michaelis-Menten kinetics, etc All of these interactions depend on a vector of kinetic parameters, θ s. In order to understand the dynamics of the biopathway, the majority of these kinetic parameters need to be inferred from observed (typically noisy and sparse) time course concentration profiles

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call