Abstract

Given a directed simple graph $G=(V,E)$ and a cost function $c:E \rightarrow R_+$, the power of a vertex $u$ in a directed spanning subgraph $H$ is given by $p_H(u) = \max_{uv \in E(H)} c(uv)$, and corresponds to the energy consumption required for wireless node $u$ to transmit to all nodes $v$ with $uv \in E(H)$. The power of $H$ is given by $p(H) = \sum_{u \in V} p_H(u)$. Power Assignment seeks to minimize $p(H)$ while $H$ satisfies some connectivity constraint. In this paper, we assume $E$ is bidirected (for every directed edge $e \in E$, the opposite edge exists and has the same cost), while $H$ is required to be strongly connected. This is the original power assignment problem introduced by Chen and Huang in 1989, who proved that a bidirected minimum spanning tree has approximation ratio at most 2 (this is tight). In 2010, we introduced a greedy approximation algorithm and claimed a ratio of 1.992. Here we improve the algorithm's analysis to 1.85, combining techniques from Robins and Zelikovsky in 2000 for Steiner Tree, and Caragiannis, Flammini, and Moscardelli in 2007 for the broadcast version of Power Assignment, together with a simple idea inspired by Byrka and coworkers in 2010. The proof also shows that a natural linear programming relaxation, introduced by Calinescu and Qiao in 2012, has integrality gap at most 1.85.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.