Abstract

Recent studies suggest that practice with approximate and non-symbolic arithmetic problems improves the math performance of adults, school aged children, and preschoolers. However, the relative effectiveness of approximate arithmetic training compared to available educational games, and the type of math skills that approximate arithmetic targets are unknown. The present study was designed to (1) compare the effectiveness of approximate arithmetic training to two commercially available numeral and letter identification tablet applications and (2) to examine the specific type of math skills that benefit from approximate arithmetic training. Preschool children (n = 158) were pseudo-randomly assigned to one of three conditions: approximate arithmetic, letter identification, or numeral identification. All children were trained for 10 short sessions and given pre and post tests of informal and formal math, executive function, short term memory, vocabulary, alphabet knowledge, and number word knowledge. We found a significant interaction between initial math performance and training condition, such that children with low pretest math performance benefited from approximate arithmetic training, and children with high pretest math performance benefited from symbol identification training. This effect was restricted to informal, and not formal, math problems. There were also effects of gender, socio-economic status, and age on post-test informal math score after intervention. A median split on pretest math ability indicated that children in the low half of math scores in the approximate arithmetic training condition performed significantly better than children in the letter identification training condition on post-test informal math problems when controlling for pretest, age, gender, and socio-economic status. Our results support the conclusion that approximate arithmetic training may be especially effective for children with low math skills, and that approximate arithmetic training improves early informal, but not formal, math skills.

Highlights

  • Math competency is an important predictor of later academic achievement and a variety of measures of adult health and economic well-being (Duncan et al, 2007; Jordan et al, 2009, 2010; Reyna et al, 2009; Geary et al, 2013; Gerardi et al, 2013)

  • Our study was designed to ask whether approximate arithmetic training positively impacts informal, and not formal, math ability in preschool aged children over and above any benefits of two commercially available educational applications

  • We did not find a benefit of approximate arithmetic training on informal math performance for all participants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Math competency is an important predictor of later academic achievement and a variety of measures of adult health and economic well-being (Duncan et al, 2007; Jordan et al, 2009, 2010; Reyna et al, 2009; Geary et al, 2013; Gerardi et al, 2013). Children and adults with greater ANS acuity score better on math achievement measures such as the TEMA, the calculation portion of the Woodcock Johnson, or even self-reported SAT exams (Halberda et al, 2008, 2012) This relation suggests that the ANS may be a building block upon which children anchor their concept of symbolic number. With the ANS, young children can compare, add, subtract, multiply, and divide, and solve simple linear equations using sets of objects with ratio-dependent precision (Barth et al, 2006; McCrink and Spelke, 2010, 2016; Kibbe and Feigenson, 2015) In contrast to these prodigious non-symbolic and approximate mathematical abilities, children must be explicitly taught how to solve the same symbolic mathematical problems effectively over years of formal schooling

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.