Abstract
Two recent models of void coalescence in columns are revisited to provide simpler, approximate expressions for the effective yield surface. Unlike the exact criteria, these are not upper-bound preserving but provide more flexibility in numerical implementation of the models. Both models correspond to limit analysis on the same geometry, namely a cylindrical void of finite height embedded in a cylindrical cell. One model employs a continuous velocity field, the other a discontinuous, yet kinematically admissible velocity field. The approximations are assessed by direct comparison to the exact criteria for several sets of the internal parameters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have