Appropriate secondary prevention of stroke and transient ischaemic attack with antithrombotics: an audit in general practice.

Abstract

Stroke is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Major advances have occurred in secondary prevention of stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during the past three decades. Primary care is a critical point of contact with patients in the implementation of secondary prevention, with the majority of patients with past stroke/TIA being managed in the community. To assess current practice at the New Queen Street and Stanground Surgeries, Peterborough, in reference to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on secondary prevention of stroke/TIA. An audit at the above practices was undertaken by searching the SystmOne computer system for adult patients with previous stroke/TIA (311), excluding those with haemorrhagic stroke and those on aspirin. The patient records of the remaining group (37) were investigated to find whether they were on appropriate antithrombotic therapy and, if not, why. Of post-stroke/TIA patients, 234/236 were receiving antithrombotic therapy unless contraindicated. For those not on antithrombotics, risk of bleeding was the reason given in 10/13 of cases, though many of these patients did not have active bleeding (exact number unclear due to poor documentation). In 2/13 cases there was no documented reason given and informed dissent in one of the 13 cases. It was found that both practices implemented the guidelines to a satisfactory degree. However, to further improve secondary prevention outreach, bleeding risk should be assessed using a tool such as S2TOP-BLEED before withholding antithrombotic therapy, as, on balance, antithrombotic therapy may still be preferable. In addition, accurate and detailed documentation of the indications/contraindications to anticoagulation is paramount for such assessment.