Abstract

BackgroundInterfraction prostate motion must be compensated by increased safety margins. If filling status of rectum and bladder is constant, motion should be reduced. We attempted to reduce interfraction motion errors by proper patient instruction.MethodIn 38 patients pairs of radio-opaque fiducial markers were implanted prior to definitive radiotherapy. Patients were positioned either according to skin marks or infrared body marker. We measured prostate displacement, i.e. pelvic bones versus intraprostatic marker position, via ExacTrac (two orthogonal radiographies) in 1252 fractions. Systematic and random setup and displacement errors were determined and safety margins estimated.ResultsIn our study interfraction prostate displacement is < 1 mm in RL direction, and < 2 mm in AP and SI direction. Systematic errors are slightly below random errors (< 1.5 mm). Positioning according skin marks results in higher inaccuracies of ±1.5 – 2 mm in RL and ±2 – 2.5 mm in AP/SI direction.ConclusionsIn case of appropriate patient instructions (constant organ filling) the positioning via bone fusion requires CTV-PTV margins of 2 mm in RL, 4 mm in AP, and 5 mm in SI direction. Studies without any description of patient instruction found much higher margins of > 1 cm in AP and SI direction.

Highlights

  • The dose–response relationship between long-term PSA control and radiation dose in the prostate is beyond controversy and validated by numerous studies and analyses, among them several randomized trials [1,2]

  • Marker based corrections have shown in numerous studies, that the uncertainties caused by the prostate movement might be significant requiring safety margins > 1 cm

  • Patients and methods From 2005 – 2010 we offered patients with prostate carcinoma a definitive radiotherapy with an additional marker-based image guidance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dose–response relationship between long-term PSA control and radiation dose in the prostate is beyond controversy and validated by numerous studies and analyses, among them several randomized trials [1,2]. The radiation exposure of the normal tissues surrounding the prostate, in particular the rectum, is mainly determined by the CTV – PTV safety margins. These margins can be influenced by the positioning technique of the patient and all measures to cover the CTV with the prescribed dose as accurate as possible. Marker based corrections have shown in numerous studies (see discussion), that the uncertainties caused by the prostate movement might be significant requiring safety margins > 1 cm. These errors are severe obstacles to further escalate the dose and should be reduced. We attempted to reduce interfraction motion errors by proper patient instruction

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.