Appropriate Categorization of Inequality to Inform Policy Decisions: Estimating Distribution of Lifetime Health Using Alternative Approaches to Socioeconomic Stratification

Abstract

ObjectivesEstimation of gradients in lifetime health, notably quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), has largely focused on index of multiple deprivation to categorize the population by socioeconomic position. In this article, we estimate QALE using alternate, individual- rather than area-level, indicators of socioeconomic position. MethodsBuilding on previous research methods, the distribution of QALE is estimated across education and income groups based on data from the Health Survey for England and the Office for National Statistics. QALE is estimated for each group by combining multivariate mortality rates and health-related quality of life (HRQL) weights using life tables. HRQL weights were estimated using ordinary least squares and missing data were handled using multiple imputation. ResultsThe estimated lifetime HRQL weights decreased with increased age, lower educational attainment, and lower income. For example, the QALE at birth for males in the lowest educational attainment group was 61.69 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), 1.54 QALYs lower than females in the same group. This is in contrast to 76.58 and 75.89 QALYs for males and females in the highest educational attainment group, respectively. A similar trend was observed across income quintiles albeit the gap was less pronounced. ConclusionsThe use of index of multiple deprivation to assess health inequalities may be masking important information about individual-level variation. Decisions makers should consider this alongside the merits of using area-level approaches to categorizing the population if individual-level approaches are preferable.