Approaches to Regulation of the Informtion Space of the Regional Social and Economic Complex in the Russian Federation

Abstract

JEL Classification Codes: O31, O34, M13, M21 Introduction Building an innovative economy as one of the strategic objectives of national development brings together most of the countries in the modern world, including the Russian Federation (RF) and the European Union (the EU). The EU and Russia are currently engaged in the creation of four common spaces: economic; an area of freedom, security and justice; space of cooperation in the field of external and foreign security; space science, culture and education. The difficulties of solving this problem arise due to the need to implement systemic reforms relying, currently achieved level of technological relationship, intellectual and social innovations, qualitative impact on the dynamics and direction of development of social relations. Innovation does not only satisfy the constantly growing needs of mankind, but also creates new knowledge and ways of commercialization as the basis for the development of the productive forces. Transfer of innovation in today's globalized world, simultaneously accelerates and complicates innovative processes. One of the main ways to stimulate and promote innovative development in the Russian Federation and the EU is via the recognition of intellectual property rights. Intellectual property rights are international by nature, which involves the cooperation of States and nations to guarantee convergence and harmonization of legislation and social institutions. Transition of States to a new level of innovation development is impossible without modernization of the regulatory mechanisms that would provide maximum opportunities to each person in order to open his creative and intellectual potential and resolve individual atypical relationship (Thalassinos et al., 2013; Thalassinos and Pociovalisteanu, 2009). In this study, we proceed from the recognition of the absolute value of the individual and the need for full and all-round development of the human personality. Survey Methodology Based on the fact that modern legal knowledge should develop not in the direction of deepening of differentiation, but instead take the path of integration of scientific and practical knowledge, we will be basing the study on the generally accepted tenets of humans as the cornerstone of the entire political system of society. The right is the beginning of a formal definition of external daily life of society, via establishing solid and precise boundaries for each person. The content of these principles is generated by the development of all aspects of human activity (Akopova, 2016; Frank et al., 2016; Nechaev and Antipina, 2016). Understanding of the new legal forms of exercise is based on reconstructive methods of knowledge. In particular, the method of "interpretation", which recreates the patterns of lawful and unlawful construction by human everyday reality. Constructivist method, i.e., evaluation of existing concepts and models of life through the reconstruction of forms of social reality (Stroeva et al., 2016; Sibirskaya et al., 2016). The statistical method, used to monitor the social innovation in order to identify the motives determining the behavior of actors in the innovation economy. Expert prediction method is used for intuitive and logical analysis and development on this basis, where it is estimated that it possible to establish the essential quality of the subject of innovation--its level of innovation activity (Sultanova and Chechina, 2016). The method of analogy as a comparison of two or more objects of study for some identity attributes used to identify the similarity of some events in the past and predict the future state of the objects under such consideration. Institutional contact method used to analyze the "embedding" of the mechanisms of new institutions and social phenomena existing in the social organism, and their mutual influence. The study widely uses comparative legal method to understand and clarify the features of national legal systems, identify common roots and principles that allow consolidating the efforts of the scientific community to develop approaches to the regulation of cross-border legal phenomena. …