Abstract
It is often the case that practical, empirically-minded historians who believe themselves to be quite exempt from the influence of any abstract social theory are, in reality, the unwitting slave of some defunct sociologist. The two sociological ghosts which haunt all attempts by historians to make sense of late medieval and early modern societies are Marxism and functionalism. This chapter briefly considers these approaches and argues that the strengths of each are synthesised in the neo-Weberian ‘closure theory’ developed by writers such as Parkin and Murphy. It considers, with the help of evidence drawn mainly from medieval England, the advantages of closure theory for historians and concludes by examining some of the criticisms which can be made of this approach.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.