Abstract

Occasionally, the expected effects of approach-avoidance motivation on anterior EEG alpha asymmetry fail to emerge, particularly in studies using affective picture stimuli. These null findings have been explained by insufficient motivational intensity of, and/or overshadowing interindividual variability within the responses to emotional pictures. These explanations were systematically tested using data from 70 students watching 5 types of affective pictures ranging from very pleasant to unpleasant. The stimulus categories reliably modulated self-reports as well as the amplitude of late positive potential, an ERP component reflecting orienting toward motivationally significant stimuli. The stimuli did not, however, induce expected asymmetry effects either for the sample or individual participants. Even while systematic stimulus-dependent individual differences emerged in self-reports as well as LPP amplitudes, the asymmetry variability was dominated by stimulus-independent interindividual variability. Taken together with previous findings, these results suggest that under some circumstances anterior asymmetry may not be an inevitable consequence of core affect. Instead, state asymmetry shifts may be overpowered by stable trait asymmetry differences and/or stimulus-independent yet situation-dependent interindividual variability, possibly caused by processes such as emotion regulation or anxious apprehension.

Highlights

  • According to the popular biphasic motivational account, anterior alpha power asymmetry reflects prefrontal lateralization of approach-avoidance processes

  • Trend level differences between asymmetries elicited by different picture categories failed to align with the prediction that asymmetry should correlate with the valence of the stimuli

  • Measured subjective ratings and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes indicated that this did not result from a lack of motivational relevance of the stimuli

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to the popular biphasic motivational account, anterior alpha power asymmetry reflects prefrontal lateralization of approach-avoidance processes (for reviews see Coan and Allen, 2004; Harmon-Jones et al, 2010; Miller et al, 2013) This model is challenged by occasional failures to find expected asymmetries in response to affective images (see Harmon-Jones et al, 2010). Such null findings are at odds with the general validity and reliability of picture stimuli for eliciting core affect, a construct closely related to biphasic motivation (Bradley and Lang, 2007). These accounts remain to be integrated with modern theories interpreting alpha in terms of active inhibition rather than passive idling (e.g., Klimesch et al, 2007; Palva and Palva, 2007; cf. Parvaz et al, 2012; Miller et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call