Abstract

Ethiopia is one of the countries which have compositions of ethnic groups and indigenous peoples, most of which they have endemic modalities of peacekeeping mechanisms and conflict resolutions practices. These varieties of Indigenous Dispute Resolution Mechanisms (hereafter IDRMs) have been using as peaceful means of disputes resolution processes. In practice, despite lack of legal recognition, informally the communities have been utilizing IDRMs to settle criminal disputes including serious ethnic conflicts. The available substantive and procedural criminal laws of Ethiopia are futile to prescribe rules which may perhaps facilitate the incorporation and better use of IDRMs into the criminal justice system. This research aims to respond question how can formal criminal justice system effectively utilize IDRMs? The researcher applied qualitative research methodology that covered both primary and secondary sources. The finding shows that IDRMs necessitates recognition through integration into the formal criminal justice system based on the restorative approach is a valuable assertion. Finally, the writer suggests the application of dynamic and participatory approach of which could recognize IDRMs as a good option to the communities to resolve disputes by the predictable peaceful solution. Such an approach can limit the challenges of the formal criminal justice system; since, those indigenous resolutions are accessible, effective and efficient, less expensive, less coercive and more respectful options.

Highlights

  • What makes related to dispute resolution? the term ‘indigenous’ has used in different perspectives; whereas, To select the specific target individuals for a qualitative this introduction focus is on the concept and relation with approach, the writer operates a purposeful or judgmental the dispute resolution

  • The indigenous dispute resolutions have a magnificent contribution to solving criminal disputes that can support the criminal justice system in different forms

  • The formal retributive criminal justice system inundated with continuing challenges that related to victims participation, community interest, and lesser concern to the harms of victims and restoration of the damage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modern formal criminal justice system flourished with modern state formation during the 14th-17th centuries (Skoll, 2009). The Egalitarian and dynamic inception of democracy and right protection were spread over Europe and North America. This age of enlightenment branded with the establishment of new perspectives of political administrations, accommodations of the diverse value of moralities, and new perspectives in understanding crime. The samples of this study are Resolution Mechanisms as collected from Amhara Regional state, one of the regions in Restorative Justice. General Overview has selected which comprise different levels of the criminal Ethiopia is one of the countries which composition of justice process and institutional organs. Customary laws have been used for a justice system officials including; Judges

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call