Abstract

Equal-time current commutators [$J(x)$, ${J}^{\ensuremath{'}}({x}^{\ensuremath{'}})$] should be calculated as suitable equal-time limits of ordinary current commutators. Since this calculation is usually ambiguous or impractical, we propose instead to define them as limits of [$J(x; \ensuremath{\xi})$, ${J}^{\ensuremath{'}}({x}^{\ensuremath{'}}; {\ensuremath{\xi}}^{\ensuremath{'}})$] for $\ensuremath{\xi}, {\ensuremath{\xi}}^{\ensuremath{'}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$, where $J(x; \ensuremath{\xi})$ is a suitable nonlocal expression in the fields which converges to $J(x)$ for $\ensuremath{\xi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0$. This alternative should be more reliable than the usual ones, such as taking equal-time limits inside of spectral representations or taking limits of time-ordered products from positive and negative time differences. The former procedure is invalid when the spectral function is nonintegrable, and the latter when equal-time $\ensuremath{\delta}$ functions are present. An analysis of two-point functions is presented which illustrates the above effects. In this connection, it is shown that the commutator $〈0|[{j}_{k}, {j}_{4}]|0〉$ in electrodynamics has a ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{k}\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\delta}(\mathrm{x}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{x}}^{\ensuremath{'}})$ term in addition to the usual ${\ensuremath{\delta}}_{k}\ensuremath{\delta}(\mathrm{x}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{x}}^{\ensuremath{'}})$ term. Our definition is shown to give correct results in a number of soluble models. It is then used to calculate commutators for electrodynamics in all orders of perturbation theory. The main new result is that, contrary to previous assertions, the commutator [${j}_{k}(x), {j}_{4}({x}^{\ensuremath{'}})$] is a $q$-number---essentially ${e}^{4}:{\mathrm{A}}^{2}:{\ensuremath{\partial}}_{k}\ensuremath{\delta}(\mathrm{x}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{x}}^{\ensuremath{'}})$ in the Gupta-Bleuler gauge. This result, together with a similar one for [${j}_{k}(x), {\stackrel{\ifmmode \dot{}\else \.{}\fi{}}{A}}_{l}({x}^{\ensuremath{'}})$], is shown to be consistent with gauge invariance and to be suitable for use in equal-time commutators which arise in reduction formulas. Finally, reduction formulas are used to explicitly establish the correctness of our results in fourth order.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.