Abstract

Goal The E / (Ea×Sa) index is an echocardiographic parameter to determine a patient's left ventricular filling pressure. This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of the echocardiographic E / (Ea×Sa) index guided diuretic therapy compared to urine output (conventional) guided diuretic treatment.Material and Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who were hospitalized due to acute decompensation episode were consecutively allocated in a 1:1 ratio to monitoring arms. The diuretic dose, which provided 20 % reduction in the E / (Ea×Sa) index value compared to initial value, was determined as adequate dose in echocardiography guided monitoring group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in weight, NT pro-BNP level and dyspnea assessment on visual analogue scale (VAS) were analyzed at the end of the monitoring.Results Although the similar doses of diuretics were used in both groups, the patients with E / (Ea×Sa) index guided strategy had the substantial lower NT pro-BNP level within 72 hours after diuretic administration (2172 vs.2514 pg / mL, p= 0.036). VAS score on dyspnea assessment was significantly better in the patients with E / (Ea×Sa) index guided strategy (52 vs. 65; p= 0.04). And, in term of body weight loss (4.93 vs.5.21 kg, p=0.87) and e-GFR (54.58±8.6 vs. 52.65±9.1 mL / min / 1.73 m2p=0.74) in both groups are associated with similar outcomes. In both groups, there was no worsening renal function and electrolyte imbalance that required stopping or decreasing loop diuretic dosing.Conclusions The E / (Ea×Sa) index guidance might be a safe strategy for more effective diuretic response that deserves consideration for selected a subgroup of acute decomposed HFrEF patients.

Highlights

  • Acute decompensation episodes are the most common reason of hospital admission in patients with heart failure (HF) and a potentially life-threatening condition which pre­do­ minantly requiring managing fluid overload and hemodynamic compromise [1, 2]

  • This study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of the echocardiographic E / (Ea×Sa) index guided diuretic therapy compared to urine output guided diuretic treatment

  • The E / (Ea×Sa) index guidance might be a safe strategy for more effective diuretic response that deserves consideration for selected a subgroup of acute decomposed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute decompensation episodes are the most common reason of hospital admission in patients with heart failure (HF) and a potentially life-threatening condition which pre­do­ minantly requiring managing fluid overload and hemodynamic compromise [1, 2]. Volume regulation and asses­ sment are central to management of HF and diuretic agents are the mainstays of therapy [3]. Current guidelines with regard to both the mode of administration and the dosing of diuretic agents are primarily based on expert opinion [4, 5]. There is uncertainty about dosing and the optimal mode of administration. Determining the individual diuretic dose in a patient is influenced by numerous factors, including previous HF treatment, degree of volume overload and renal function. More effective use of diuretics is fundamental to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with HF

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call