Abstract

Orientation: Technological innovations and developments in methods of productivity have resulted in an increased demand for technically-oriented artisans. However, the supply of qualified artisans is insufficient to meet the demand.Research purpose: This article is the product of a systematic investigation into the extent and nature of empirical literature related to human resource selection practices used for apprentices.Motivation for the study: The authors noted inadequate research into the selection practices used for apprentices. This investigation was motivated by the need to systematically verify the extent and nature of the empirical literature on apprentice selection, both internationally and nationally.Research design, approach and method: A systematic literature review of published empirical research articles (for the period 1990–2020) in scholarly databases was conducted. The literature was accessed through relevant databases within the business management, human resource management and industrial psychology fields. The literature was restricted to scholarly (i.e., peer reviewed journals), English full textual data. Twelve combinations of two clusters of key words were used in the search function. The first cluster was apprentice, apprenticeship and artisan, with the second cluster being selection, selection process, staffing and recruitment. Four exclusion categories were used to reject literature that were unrelated, dissimilar and unconnected with the purpose of the literature review.Main findings: From the comprehensive review of the literature, 12 articles were found to have content related to the selection of apprentices. Five core themes, with 11 sub-themes, were identified from this literature. A research agenda is proposed with research questions identified for each theme.Practical/managerial implications: This literature review has provided a synthesised summary of the available literature on apprentice selection. Through the provision of a research agenda, this article contributes by providing a foundation for further research in the field.Contribution/value-add: This article adds to the current literature available on apprentice selection practices. This should alert researchers of the need to further explore this area to enhance knowledge and understanding of the best practices employed in the selection of apprentices.

Highlights

  • Key focus of the studyEconomic growth, improved innovation, enhanced entrepreneurship, and business productivity are interlinked with Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematical (STEM) skills (Xue & Larson 2015)

  • Given that only approximately 24% – 45% of learners are currently passing the trade test each year (Government Gazette 2015; Van Rooyen et al 2010), there is a significant shortfall in the annual production rate of artisans (Duarte 2017)

  • This study aims to ‘comprehensively locate and synthesise research on a particular question or problem, using organised, transparent and replicable procedures at each step of the process’ (Bless, Higson-Smith & Sithole 2013:52)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Key focus of the studyEconomic growth, improved innovation, enhanced entrepreneurship, and business productivity are interlinked with Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematical (STEM) skills (Xue & Larson 2015). Jobs have become increasingly demanding given the replacement of routine tasks with advanced technology (Cedefop 2016; Giffi et al 2015). Both internationally and within South Africa (SA), there has been an accelerated shift towards skills biased technical change (Hafni et al 2020; Nomvete, Adams & Moloto 2020). Given that only approximately 24% – 45% of learners are currently passing the trade test each year (Government Gazette 2015; Van Rooyen et al 2010), there is a significant shortfall in the annual production rate of artisans (Duarte 2017). The competition can replicate certain assets and processes, such as operational technology and product design, but the HR asset remains unique (Breaugh 2013; Shatouri, Omar & Igusa 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.