Abstract
This article looks at the history of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM) classification system, its role and limitations, while making comparisons and contrasts to Recovery philosophies in relation to elderly dementia from a social work perspective. It was found that the clinician, caregiver and patient can all play a role in Recovery, and while not comparable the DSM complements psychosocial models of Recovery. It was also found that with the diversification and expansion of an increasing ageing population, gerontological social workers will need to modify and adapt practice skills and interventions as changes in evidence-based practices of Recovery and the DSM are disseminated at a faster rate.
Highlights
The New Zealand ageing population is increasing
This essay will look at the history of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM) classification system, its role and limitations, while making comparisons with and contrasts to Recovery philosophies with regard to elderly dementia
Noted by the DSM-IV, these problems are not included in the definition of dementia as cognitive changes are; many critics believe there is too much focus on describing cognitive changes
Summary
Robyn is undertaking a Postgraduate Certificate in Health (Allied Mental Health) at Victoria University
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
