Abstract
Gwilliam (1988a) examined the application of the concept of contributory negligence in U.K. and British Commonwealth cases involving auditors. This paper examines recent developments in New Zealand regarding contributory negligence as a defence in contract. Further, it criticizes Gwilliam's discussion of policy issues and suggests that, for New Zealand and Australia, the fundamental issue is whether apportionment is appropriate for an audit contract. It supports moves to introduce some form of legislation which will limit the liability of auditors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
