Abstract

ABSTRACT The grading of chemical engineering capstone design project student reports represents a considerable burden on educators, due to the detailed calculations undertaken by students. The reports represent the accumulation of calculations into material and energy balances, detailed process and mechanical designs, process control as well as economic analysis. To facilitate these calculations, most students utilise computational programs and detailed spreadsheets. Hence, the verification of the resulting mathematics behind the generated data requires significant time commitment. To simplify this verification for grading, the significant-digit law was applied here to chemical engineering student design project reports. The use of this law enables large-scale data sets to be quickly analysed to establish if the data has been manipulated or errors exist. The significant-digit law was successfully shown to apply to chemical engineering students’ design project reports, with four abnormal student reports identified that deviated from the law due to fraud/errors in their design calculations. Importantly, applying the significant-digit law enabled a rapid approach to verifying the mathematics within the design project reports. This reduces the time burden on educators, enabling them to focus on ensuring the correct design equations and procedures have been applied.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.