Abstract

The authors compared an affordance operationalization to two traditional operationalizations of traits. Following Beauvois and Dubois (2000), it is argued that traits involve a consistency in both the target behaviors (TBs) and others’ behaviors toward the target (OBs). Conceptually, TBs represent descriptive knowledge (what the target tends to do) and OBs represent functional knowledge (what the target tends to afford). To compare the operationalizations, 49 participants were asked to judge videotapes of 12 targets using one of three rating modes: (a) global trait labels, (b) TBs, or (3) OBs. Results showed that (a) targets were more differentiated with OBs than with TBs or trait labels and (b) trait scales were more homogeneous with OBs than with TBs or trait labels. Consequences of a Gibsonian approach to person perception are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.