Abstract

High rates of inappropriate use of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis were reported in many countries. Auditing the prophylactic antimicrobial use in enormous medical records by manual review is labor-intensive and time-consuming. The purpose of this study is to develop accurate and efficient machine learning models for auditing appropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. The supervised machine learning classifiers (Auto-WEKA, multilayer perceptron, decision tree, SimpleLogistic, Bagging, and AdaBoost) were applied to an antimicrobial prophylaxis dataset, which contained 601 instances with 26 attributes. Multilayer perceptron, SimpleLogistic selected by Auto-WEKA, and decision tree algorithms had outstanding discrimination with weighted average AUC > 0.97. The Bagging and SMOTE algorithms could improve the predictive performance of decision tree against imbalanced datasets. Although with better performance measures, multilayer perceptron and Auto-WEKA took more execution time as compared with that of other algorithms. Multilayer perceptron, SimpleLogistic, and decision tree algorithms have outstanding performance measures for identifying the appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis. The efficient models developed by machine learning can be used to assist the antimicrobial stewardship team in the audit of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. In future research, we still have the challenges and opportunities of enriching our datasets with more useful clinical information to improve the performance of the algorithms.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) is estimated to be ~2–5% in patients undergoing surgery [1]

  • The purpose of this study is to develop accurate and efficient machine learning models for auditing appropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis

  • To assess the performance of a classifier, we considered the following results reported by WEKA: true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) [12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) is estimated to be ~2–5% in patients undergoing surgery [1]. SSIs are SSI are associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The financial impact of SSIs is the highest among all healthcare-associated infections. The annual cost of SSIs in the United States of America is estimated to be $3.5–10 billion [2]. About 40–60% of SSIs are preventable by the interventions with evidence-based measures [1,2]. The interventions include antimicrobial prophylaxis, preoperative bathing and showering, glucose control, skin preparation, intraoperative normothermia, and wound closure [1,3–5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call