Abstract
The shifting bottleneck (SB) heuristic is among the most successful approximation methods for solving the job shop problem. It is essentially a machine based decomposition procedure where a series of one machine sequencing problems (OMSPs) are solved. However, such a procedure has been reported to be highly ineffective for the flow shop problems. In particular, we show that for the 2-machine flow shop problem, the SB heuristic will deliver the optimal solution in only a small number of instances. We examine the reason behind the failure of the machine based decomposition method for the flow shop. An optimal machine based decomposition procedure is formulated for the 2-machine flow shop, the time complexity of which is worse than that of the celebrated Johnson’s rule. The contribution of the present study lies in showing that the same machine based decomposition procedures which are so successful in solving complex job shops can also be suitably modified to optimally solve the simpler flow shops.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.