Abstract
The present work aims at optimization and advanced simulation of removal efficiency of dye material from a synthetic wastewater using a locally generated rhamnolipid (RL) biosurfactant. For this purpose, bio-treatment of dye polluted synthetic wastewater was experimentally, kinetically, and statistically investigated by the ion flotation process in the presence of the RL. The removal rate of methylene blue (MB) as the dye material was assessed by the ultraviolet (UV)-visible absorbance measurements. The impact of operating variables including RL concentration (as a dye collector, 5–50 ppm), methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) dosage (as a frother, 10–70 ppm), solution pH (2–12) and aeration rate (1–5 l/min) were assessed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Anderson-Darling as the normality analysis strategy. The process was simulated using two artificial neural network (ANN) optimization algorithms, i.e., genetic algorithm (GA) and artificial bee colony (ABC) as a novel approach. The statistical results indicated that the dye removal process was significantly influenced by all operating variables (pvalue<0.05) while their relative intensity followed the order of aeration rate > solution pH > RL concentration > MIBC dosage. Anderson-Darling approach disclosed that the all factors were perfectly followed the normal trend with A2 less than unity and p-value of greater than 0.05 at 95% confidence level. Main effect plots revealed that except MIBC dosage with nonlinear trend, the rest of factors had an ascending influence on the removal efficiency. The process was optimized by interpreting the interaction effect among various variables to reach the maximum dye bioflotation. The maximum removal of 97 ± 0.13% was achieved at pH 12, airflow rate of 5 l/min, MIBC and rhamnolipid concentrations of 30 and 40 ppm, respectively with a flotation kinetic rate of 0.015 sec−1. Finally, the intelligent simulation results showed that the process could be modelled using an artificial bee colony algorithm of 4-7-1 structure with 99% and 98.8% accuracies in the training and testing steps, respectively. Further, we found that the artificial bee colony algorithm was superior to the genetic algorithm in terms of complexity analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.