Abstract

Comprehensive safety evaluation methodologies for automated driving systems that account for the large complexity real traffic are currently being developed. This work adopts a scenario-based safety evaluation approach and aims at investigating an advanced methodology to generate test cases by applying heuristics to naturalistic driving data. The targeted requirements of the generated test cases are severity, exposure, and realism. The methodology starts with the extraction of scenarios from the data and their split in two subsets—containing the relatively more critical scenarios and, respectively, the normal driving scenarios. Each subset is analysed separately, in regard to the parameter value distributions and occurrence of dependencies. Subsequently, a heuristic search-based approach is applied to generate test cases. The resulting test cases clearly discriminate between safety critical and normal driving scenarios, with the latter covering a wider spectrum than the former. The verification of the generated test cases proves that the proposed methodology properly accounts for both severity and exposure in the test case generation process. Overall, the current study contributes to fill a gap concerning the specific applicable methodologies capable of accounting for both severity and exposure and calls for further research to prove its applicability in more complex environments and scenarios.

Highlights

  • A scenario test suite, that addresses the components of decision making and trajectory planning of the architecture of an autonomous driving (AD)-system [11], must consider various requirements, regarding severity, realism, and exposure

  • The scenario-based approach is necessary, but not sufficient, to ensure the safety of an AD system, and the selection of specific test cases shall focus on ensuring representativeness and coverage of both corner-cases, as well as the general patterns observed in real traffic

  • This study aims to investigate an advanced methodology to generate scenario-specific test suites that account for realism, severity, and exposure requirements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As automated and autonomous driving (AD) systems get ready to penetrate the market, their safety evaluation and approval for public roads demands standardized and harmonized safety evaluation methodologies To fulfil this demand, several international efforts are being undertaken by large scale research projects, such as PEGASUS [1,2,3], SAKURA [4,5,6], Ko-HAF [7,8], Catapult [9], and Streetwise [10]. Other complementary aspects of safety shall be addressed, including functional safety [ISO 26262], safety of the intended functionality [ISO 21448], or cybersecurity [ISO 21434]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.