Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper outlines a qualitative methodological approach called Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP), considering its applicability to health psychology research. As applied to health psychology, the growth of discursive methodologies within the discipline tends to be located within a critical health psychology approach where CDP and others enable a consideration of how wider societal discourses shape understandings and experiences of health and illness. Despite the increasing usage of CDP as a methodology, little has been written on the practical application of the method to date, with papers instead focusing on the theoretical underpinnings of a CDP approach. This paper seeks to address that gap and offers a step by step guide to the key principles and analytic stages of CDP before giving a worked example of CDP applied to a health topic, in this case ‘baby-led weaning’ (BLW). As we discuss, a key strength of CDP, particularly in relation to health psychology, is in its attempts to understand both macro and micro levels of data analysis. By doing so it offers a nuanced and richer understanding of how particular health topics are working within context. Therefore, CDP is a readily applicable analytic approach to contested and complicated topic areas within health research.

Highlights

  • This paper focuses on the applicability of Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP) to research within health psychology

  • Building on previous work that began to map the steps of CDP (Budds, 2013: Budds, Locke, & Burr, 2017), it moves to a guide on how to conduct a CDP analysis before offering a worked example applied to a health topic – baby-led weaning (BLW)

  • In stage four of a CDP analysis, we suggest the focus should turn to the positions that are made available to people through the interpretative repertoires that are in operation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper focuses on the applicability of Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP) to research within health psychology. An example of critical health work from a Foucauldian Discourse Analytic approach includes Gillies and Willig’s (1997) study which examined the wider discursive constructions women used to justify smoking behaviour.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call