Abstract

Despite calls for evaluation practice to take a complex systems approach, there are few examples of how to incorporate complexity into real-life evaluations. This article presents the case for using a complex systems approach to evaluate a school-based intimate partner violence-prevention intervention. We conducted a post hoc analysis of qualitative evaluation data to examine the intervention as a potential system disruptor. We analysed data in relation to complexity concepts particularly relevant to schools: ‘diverse and dynamic agents’, ‘interaction’, ‘unpredictability’, ‘emergence’ and ‘context dependency’. The data—two focus groups with facilitators and 33 repeat interviews with 14–17-year-old students—came from an evaluation of a comprehensive sexuality education intervention in Mexico City, which serves as a case study for this analysis. The findings demonstrate an application of complex adaptive systems concepts to qualitative evaluation data. We provide examples of how this approach can shed light on the ways in which interpersonal interactions, group dynamics, the core messages of the course and context influenced the implementation and outcomes of this intervention. This gender-transformative intervention appeared to disrupt pervasive gender norms and reshape beliefs about how to engage in relationships. An intervention comprises multiple dynamic and interacting elements, all of which are unlikely to be consistent across implementation settings. Applying complexity concepts to our analysis added value by helping reframe implementation-related data to focus on how the ‘social’ aspects of complexity influenced the intervention. Without examining both individual and group processes, evaluations may miss key insights about how the intervention generates change, for whom, and how it interacts with its context. A social complex adaptive systems approach is well-suited to the evaluation of gender-transformative interventions and can help identify how such interventions disrupt the complex social systems in which they are implemented to address intractable societal problems.

Highlights

  • Despite calls over the last decade for evaluation practice to take a complex systems approach and move beyond the individual to explore macro-level effects, there are few examples of how to incorporate the concept of complexity into real-life evaluations (Smith and Petticrew, 2010; Craig and Petticrew, 2013; Moore et al, 2019)

  • A social complex adaptive systems approach is well-suited to the evaluation of gender-transformative interventions and can help identify how such interventions disrupt the complex social systems in which they are implemented to address intractable societal problems, such as intimate partner violence

  • Applications of complexity theory for interventions that address complex phenomena driven by underlying social norms, e.g. intimate partner violence (IPV), are rare

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite calls over the last decade for evaluation practice to take a complex systems approach and move beyond the individual to explore macro-level effects, there are few examples of how to incorporate the concept of complexity into real-life evaluations (Smith and Petticrew, 2010; Craig and Petticrew, 2013; Moore et al, 2019). One study in New Zealand applied complexity theory to conceptualize the healthcare system response to IPV but did not mention the additional complexities of social norms or gender (Gear et al, 2018). Taking these into account is important, as social norms are important drivers of the harmful global phenomenon of IPV (Jewkes et al, 2019) and gender itself is a complex social system that defines what we expect of women and men in any given society (Hirdman, 1991; Heise et al, 2019). There is a growing evidence base examining community-based interventions that address gendered social norms as part of IPV prevention efforts (Jewkes et al, 2019); these studies rarely adopt a complex systems approach and few are carried out in schools. We consider the case for using a complex adaptive systems framework to evaluate school-based IPV prevention interventions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.