Abstract

First-aid stations were divided randomly into 4 groups. Advanced airway for sudden cardiac arrest patients with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was established in groups A and C while trachea cannula was inserted on spot of emergency medical service (EMS) or in ambulance in groups B and D. According to the results, the success rate of insertion and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of groups A and C were higher than the other two groups (P<0.05). However, the required time was shorter (P<0.05). Due to a difficult catheterization environment, LMA is more effective and convenient than trachea cannula in EMS. Key words: emergency medical service; laryngeal mask airway

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.