Application timing and adjuvant type affected saflufenacil efficacy on selected broadleaf weeds

Abstract

Saflufenacil is a new herbicide being developed for pre-plant burndown and pre-emergence broadleaf weed control in field crops, including maize, soybean, sorghum and wheat. Field experiments were conducted in 2007 and 2008 in northeast Nebraska, USA to describe dose-response curves of saflufenacil applied in mid (early post-emergence, EPOST) and late May (late post-emergence, LPOST) with several adjuvants for spring emerging broadleaf weed control. Dose-response curves based on log-logistic model were utilized to determine the ED 90 values (effective dose that provides 90% weed control efficacy) for Convolvulus arvensis, Lactuca serriola, Lamium amplexicaule, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Taraxacum officinale, Thlaspi arvense and Conyza canadensis. In general, weed control efficacy was influenced by application timing and type of adjuvant. EPOST application of saflufenacil resulted better efficacy of saflufenacil compared to LPOST. Addition of spray adjuvants improved efficacy of saflufenacil. For example, 90% control of T. arvense was obtained at EPOST application with 251, 161, 96 and 59 g a.i. ha −1 for saflufenacil applied alone, or tank-mixed with NIS (nonionic surfactant), COC (crop oil concentrate), or MSO (methylated seed oil), respectively. In contrast, the ED 90 values with LPOST application were 333, 201, 127 and 79 g a.i. ha −1 for saflufenacil applied alone, or with NIS, COC and MSO, respectively. MSO was the best adjuvant, which provided the most enhancement of saflufenacil. COC was the second best, or similar to MSO, on many weed species. NIS provided the least enhancement of saflufenacil. The ED 90 values determined for different broadleaf weed species are within the proposed label dose of saflufenacil.