Abstract

BackgroundViral infection by dengue virus is a major public health problem in tropical countries. Early diagnosis and detection are increasingly based on quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) directed against genomic regions conserved between different isolates. Genetic variation can however result in mismatches of primers and probes with their targeted nucleic acid regions. Whole genome sequencing allows to characterize and track such changes, which in turn enables to evaluate, optimize, and (re-)design novel and existing RT-qPCR methods. The immense amount of available sequence data renders this however a labour-intensive and complex task.ResultsWe present a bioinformatics approach that enables in silico evaluation of primers and probes intended for routinely employed RT-qPCR methods. This approach is based on analysing large amounts of publically available whole genome data, by first employing BLASTN to mine the genomic regions targeted by the RT-qPCR method(s), and afterwards using BLASTN-SHORT to evaluate whether primers and probes will anneal based on a set of simple in silico criteria. Using dengue virus as a case study, we evaluated 18 published RT-qPCR methods using more than 3000 publically available genomes in the NCBI Virus Variation Resource, and provide a systematic overview of method performance based on in silico sensitivity and specificity.ConclusionsWe provide a comprehensive overview of dengue virus RT-qPCR method performance that will aid appropriate method selection allowing to take specific measures that aim to contain and prevent viral spread in afflicted regions. Notably, we find that primer-template mismatches at their 3′ end may represent a general issue for dengue virus RT-qPCR detection methods that merits more attention in their development process. Our approach is also available as a public tool, and demonstrates how utilizing genomic data can provide meaningful insights in an applied public health setting such as the detection of viral species in human diagnostics.

Highlights

  • Viral infection by dengue virus is a major public health problem in tropical countries

  • Developed quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) methods must be validated in the laboratory on a large set of reference samples to verify that the targeted genomic regions are adequately conserved within the species or serotype depending on the desired resolution

  • Our approach is novel because it provides an estimate for routinely employed (RT-)qPCR method performance through an in silico evaluation of the appropriateness of primers and probes based on several thousands of dengue genomes, and was born from the need encountered by a routine enforcement laboratory to relatively quickly and screen large quantities of genome data in order to provide an estimate on the number of genomes in which the RT-qPCR method is expected to give a signal

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Viral infection by dengue virus is a major public health problem in tropical countries. Diagnosis and detection are increasingly based on quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) directed against genomic regions conserved between different isolates. Among diagnostic tests for early discovery, RNA detection by quantitative reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) represents a fast, specific and sensitive tool for the management of acute infections, surveillance and outbreak investigations allowing both detection and quantification of viral RNA [6]. The appropriate mix of designed primers and probes can even allow to differentiate between different serotypes by using a unique multiplex reaction [7]. Developed RT-qPCR methods must be validated in the laboratory on a large set of reference samples to verify that the targeted genomic regions are adequately conserved within the species or serotype depending on the desired resolution. A limited number of reference samples were used in the experimental validation of routinely employed (RT-)qPCR methods (e.g. [9]), which is unlikely to represent the entire pool of standing genetic variation [10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call