Application of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon injury.

Abstract

To explore the value of virtual touch imaging and quantification (VTIQ) shear wave elastography (SWE) in diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon tear. Eighty patients with unilateral supraspinatus tendon tear underwent shoulder arthroscopy were prospective studied. Tendinopathy, partial-thickness tear or full-thickness tear of supraspinatus tendon were diagnosed according 2D ultrasound examination. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ultrasonic diagnosis of supraspinatus tendon tear were calculated by arthroscopy as the gold standard. VTIQ was applied to measure the shear-wave velocity (SWV) of both normal and affected supraspinatus tendon. The differences of SWV in three types of supraspinatus tendon tear and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed. Among 80 patients, there were 20 tendinopathy, 31 partial tears and 29 full-thickness tears diagnosed by shoulder arthroscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 2D ultrasound in diagnosis of tendinopathy, partial tear and full-thickness tear groups were 78%, 90%and 83%; 71%, 86%and 73%; 86%, 88%and 88%, respectively. SWV of 80 supraspinatus tendon tears was 4.59±1.00 m/s, which was lower than that of normal supraspinatus tendon (4.59±1.00 m/s vs. 6.68±1.05 m/s, P < 0.01). SWV of supraspinatus tendon in tendinopathy, partial tear and full-thickness tear groups respectively were 5.66±0.97, 4.66±1.00, and 3.78±0.55 m/s, all lower than that of the contralateral normal supraspinatus tendon (all P < 0.05). In addition, the analysis of variance and pairwise comparison showed that SWV of supraspinatus tendon among three different degree of injury was statistically significant (all P < 0.001). The cutoff thresholds of SWV was 4.83 m/s to identify tendinopathy tear from partial tear and was 4.08 m/s to identify full-thickness tear from partial-thickness tear. VTIQ SWE with SWV might identify degree of supraspinatus tendon tear and improve the value of ultrasonography, which should be further evaluated in large multicenter studies.