Abstract

Introduction: Monte Carlo (MC) is considered to be the most accurate method to calculate dose distribution in radiation therapy. However, the limitation of MC simulations is the long calculation time to reach the desired statistical uncertainty in the dose calculation as well as in clinical practice. To overcome the above limitations, Variance reduction techniques (VRTs) has developed and shorten the calculation time while maintaining accuracy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is the application of VRTs in code EGSnrc to find the optimal method for accelerator simulation and calculated dose distribution using MC method.
 Methods: The linear Accelerator HPD Siemens Primus at the General Hospital of Dong Nai had been simulated by using BEAMnrc code and several variance reduction techniques such as: range rejection, photon forcing, bremsstrahlung photon splitting (uniform, selective and direction)... These VRTs were used under the same set of input parameters as histories of 2x108, photon energy of 6 MV, structure, size and material of the phantom… The computational efficiency ε is calculated by the following equation ε = 1/T.σ2 where T is the CUP time of calculation and σ2 is an estimate of the variance, for evaluating and selecting the VRT which gives the best computational efficiency.
 Results: The results showed a good agreement between the calculated dose and measured ones when applying different VRTs. These techniques were significantly reduced uncertainty in simulation compared the analog cases. Specifically, the efficiency of DBS and UBS improved by more than 90 times and 15 times compared with the analog instances, respectively. Rang rejection and photon forcing techniques also haveimproved the efficiency of simulation, but not significantly.
 Conclusions: The application of the VRTs for EGSnrc increase the efficiency of the simulation. VRTs is a powerful tool that should be applied for the simulation by code EGSnrc to improve calculation efficiency by reducing simulation time and its variance. Our results show that the direction bremsstrahlung splitting (DBS) gives thebest computational efficiency.

Highlights

  • Monte Carlo (MC) is considered to be the most accurate method to calculate dose distribution in radiation therapy

  • The linear accelerator HPD Siemens Primus at Dong Nai General Hospital had been simulated by using BEAMnrc code and applied several variance reduction techniques (VRTs) such as range rejection, photon forcing, bremsstrahlung photon splitting,...These VRTs were used under the same set of input parameters as histories of 2x108, the photon energy of 6 MV, structure, size and material of the phantom,...The computational efficiency ε is calculated by the following equation ε

  • Rang rejection and photon forcing techniques have improved the efficiency of simulation, but not significantly

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monte Carlo (MC) is considered to be the most accurate method to calculate dose distribution in radiation therapy. It is directly affects the efficiency of the calculation and affects the practicality of the application of simulation Up to this time, there has been a lot of published research studies are demonstrating that simulation code based on Monte Carlo method can produce excellent results with reasonable uncertainties (MCNP, PENELOPE, EGS,...) 1–4. One of the issues associated with Monte Carlo simulations is the potentially significant CPU time required to reach the desired statistical uncertainty [1,5] even though the strong growth of technology and the increase dramatically in the speed of computers To resolve these issues, variance reduction techniques (VRTs) were introduced to reduce the calculation time and increase the efficiency of the simulation.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.