Application of untreated versus pyrolysed sewage sludge in agriculture: A life cycle assessment

Abstract

Recycling of phosphorus (P) from waste streams such as sewage sludge to agriculture is essential in order to ensure future food security. Land application of sewage sludge is controversial due to its content of pollutants, such as heavy metals and toxic organic compounds. Pyrolysis is a technology that can eliminate harmful contaminants while enabling the recycling of P in the sludge. Organic pollutants are degraded during pyrolysis, while most of the P remains and approximately 40 % of the carbon is retained in a stable form in the biochar. When performing pyrolysis at a temperature of around 800 °C or more, cadmium is evaporated and can be separated from the biochar. Electricity-driven pyrolysis facilitates this by means of easier temperature control. The aim of the present study was to undertake a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impacts of high-temperature electricity-driven pyrolysis of sewage sludge, including the separation of cadmium, and field application of sludge biochar as compared with sewage sludge storage and field application. The results showed that pyrolysis can offer a more climate-friendly solution due to avoided greenhouse gas emissions from the sludge and to carbon sequestration of the biochar. However, field application of untreated sludge resulted in a higher application of nitrogen (N) and more plant-available P. Agricultural modelling tools indicated that this produces higher crop yields than biochar application. In the LCA model, higher crop yields lead to savings in land use and water consumption as the higher yields can replace other crop production. The lower plant availability of biochar P implies a possible risk of lower yields when the P application is restricted based on total P, and a risk of greater P loss with soil erosion to the environment. Overall, the present study stresses the importance of including the long-term agronomic impacts of sludge and biochar field application in LCAs, and highlights the trade-offs that need to be considered in decision-making regarding the implementation of pyrolysis technology.