Abstract
The application of the Ti-in-zircon thermometer to granitic rock requires consideration of a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }} and a_{{{text{SiO}}_{2} }} during zircon crystallization. Thermodynamic software programs such as rhyolite-MELTS or Perple_X permit the estimation of a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }} and a_{{{text{SiO}}_{2} }} values from whole-rock geochemical data as a function of pressure and temperature. Model calculations carried out on a set of 14 different granite types at 2 kbar, 5 kbar, and H2O = 3 wt% show a_{{{text{SiO}}_{2} }} during zircon crystallization close to 1 (0.75–1) and a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }} generally far below unity (0.1–0.6). This would suggest that Ti-in-zircon temperatures for granites must be significantly upward corrected relative to the original TiO2- and SiO2-saturated calibration of the thermometer. Both the rhyolite-MELTS and Perple_X calculations indicate that a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }} is typically around 0.5 in ilmenite-bearing granites. Thus, for ilmenite-series granites (that is, almost all S-type and many I-type granites), it could be a reasonable first order approximation to apply a constant temperature correction of + 70 °C to the Ti-in-zircon thermometer. Granites lacking the paragenesis zircon–ilmenite, that is, some A-type granites and a few special I-type granites may have even lower a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }} (0.1–0.5) and some of them may require a huge upward correction of Ti-in-zircon temperatures on the order of 100–200 °C. Using a set of Ti-in-zircon measurements from a Variscan granite of the Bohemian Massif, we introduce a novel T-dependent a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }} and a_{{{text{SiO}}_{2} }} correction of Ti-in-zircon calculated temperatures which is based on a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }}-, a_{{{text{SiO}}_{2} }}–T functions modelled with rhyolite-MELTS. This method takes into account that early and late zircons in granitic systems may crystallize at different a_{{{text{SiO}}_{2} }} and a_{{{text{TiO}}_{2} }}. Furthermore, we highlight the usefulness of comparing the corrected results of Ti-in-zircon thermometry with bulk-rock-Zr-based zircon solubility thermometry and ideal zircon crystallization temperature distributions for granites, and we present a graphical method that enables this comparison. In addition, this paper addresses the problem that Ti-in-zircon measurements are commonly collected with only moderate spatial analytical resolution, which leads to an averaging effect and to difficulties in recording accurate crystallization temperatures. Therefore, we propose that Ti-in-zircon thermometry for granites should generally rely on the more representative median-T (Tmed) value of a series of zircon analyses. Peak magma temperatures will be, in general, 35–50 °C above Tmed, as can be modelled using zircon crystallization temperature distributions.
Highlights
The Ti-in-zircon thermometer (Watson et al 2006) could become a most interesting petrological tool for research on granitic rocks if we succeed to overcome a few ongoing problems
Our results clearly suggest that Ti-in-zircon temperatures for granites have to be significantly upward corrected relative to the original TiO2and SiO2-saturated calibration of the thermometer, due to generally low aTiO2
Most have TiO2 contents that correspond to aTiO2 values of around or just below 0.5 (Fig. 5), and this agrees very well with the rhyolite-MELTS calculations performed in the present paper for a series of granitic rocks
Summary
The Ti-in-zircon thermometer (Watson et al 2006) could become a most interesting petrological tool for research on granitic rocks if we succeed to overcome a few ongoing problems. While the thermometer is ideally suited for rocks that carry cogenetic zircon, rutile, and quartz (e.g., high-pressure granulites), its application to granites is not straightforward. Most granites lack rutile implying that aTiO2 must have been below unity when the zircons formed. Granites are SiO2-rich, aSiO2 can be below unity during early zircon crystallization, because quartz is normally not present at near liquidus conditions (Johannes and Holtz 1991). An equation that corrects the Ti-in-zircon thermometer for the effects of reduced aTiO2 and aSiO2 is given by Ferry and Watson (2007): log (ppm Ti) = 5.711 ± 0.072 − 4800(±86)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.