Abstract
In this paper, the transmission line method (TLM) is applied to the solution of the general, n th order, continuous Kalman filter estimation equations. A comparison is made between this method, the first-order Gear algorithm and the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method, in the estimation of the voltage drop and its derivative across a capacitor in an LCR circuit. An analysis is made of the sensitivity of the algorithms to changing time step and measurement error variance. In most cases, the Runge-Kutta method has the best performance at the expense of computing time. However, in some cases, the new algorithm yields less biased and smoother estimates. The TLM algorithm performs consistently better than the Gear method for the particular problem analysed. The CPU time for the TLM algorithm has also been compared with that required by the Gear and Runge-Kutta methods; the TLM method is found to take approximately 25% of the time required by the Runge-Kutta method to process one measurement. The TLM algorithm appears to present a compromise between accuracy of estimation and computing time. Finally, suggestions are made for further work.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.