APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE GENERAL THEORY OF MEASUREMENTS WHEN SOLVING SELECTION PROBLEMS

Abstract

The impetus for this publication was an article on the possibility and need to use the general theory of measurement in judicial practice based on considerations of the state and prospects of judicial decisions by the judiciary, as they solve the problem of choice (punishment or justification) as a result expert evaluation in conditions of uncertainty. The article discusses the possibility of disseminating methods and tools for decision-making in the field of metrology as a result of measurement and expert evaluation in conditions of uncertainty in such areas as pedagogical and general qualimetry. To solve the problem, it is proposed to use in educational practice to assess the level of learning (level of acquisition of knowledge, skills and abilities) of subjects of learning four-point scales of the order. Their compatibility with the stobal rating scale and the corresponding ESTC scale is shown. The corresponding nomogram is given, the logarithmic four-point scale of which is obtained on the basis of the probabilistic-information approach. The procedure of data processing of expert assessment (measurement) in pedagogical qualimetry is considered, which can be partially used for processing the characteristics of objects of comparison (OC) in qualimetry. The possibility of applying traditional and improved four-point scales and elements of fuzzy mathematics in qualimetry in the construction of OC models. As directions of implementation of the principles of the general theory of measurements and procedures of expert estimation (measurement) at the decision of problems of a choice it is offered to improve legal, normative, directive and other documents on metrological activity concerning concrete subject area and objects of comparison, and distribution of their scope.