Abstract
Public health professionals have been challenged to radically reform public health training to meet evolving demands of twenty-first century public health. Such a transformation requires a systems thinking approach with an interdisciplinary focus on problem solving, leadership, management and teamwork, technology and information, budgeting and finance, and communication. This article presents processes for implementing and evaluating a revised public health curriculum and outlines lessons learned from this initiative. To date, more than 200 students have participated in the initial pilot testing of this program. A rigorous process and outcome evaluation plan was developed and employed. Results from the evaluation were used to enhance the resulting curriculum. Specifically, all instructional materials were evaluated by both the students who received the materials and the faculty who presented the materials. As each successive pilot is delivered, both enrollment and faculty involvement has increased. Through this process, the value of committed faculty, the importance of engaging learners in the evaluation of an education program, and the need to implement curriculum that has been carefully evaluated and evidence-informed in nature has emerged. We credit our successful transformation of the Masters in Public Health core to the challenge provided by the Framing the Future task force, the commitment of our College of Public Health leadership, the engagement of our faculty, and the time we allowed for the process to unfold. Ultimately, we believe this transformed curriculum will result in better trained public health professionals, interdisciplinary practitioners who can see public health challenges in new and different ways.
Highlights
AND RATIONALEThe Lancet Commission Report (2010) called for radical reform in the training of health professionals to meet the evolving demands of twenty-first century public health
The College of Public Health (COPH) at the University of South Florida (USF) engaged in a multiyear, systematic process using the Intervention Mapping (IM) framework [5] to transform our Masters in Public Health (MPH) education into an integrative, comprehensive, and skills-based program to better meet the needs of the twenty-first century learner, while ensuring a stronger practitioner armed with the tools required to combat emerging public health challenges
The MPH degree at the USF COPH is accredited by the Council on Education in Public Health (CEPH) and, the core curriculum at USF must meet the CEPH Foundational Core Competencies
Summary
The Lancet Commission Report (2010) called for radical reform in the training of health professionals to meet the evolving demands of twenty-first century public health. A major accomplishment of the transformation process was the development of ten interdisciplinary MPH core competencies that respond to the field’s demand that academicians make a conscious effort to rethink public health education, as well as our own desire for a stronger, more rigorous, efficient and effective public health degree program [3, 6] These revised MPH core competencies provided a rigorous integration of traditional core curricular content within an expanded scope that includes systems thinking, globalization and sustainability, informatics, leadership and management, program planning, advocacy, and communication (blinded for review, 2017). Such curricular goals are designed to meet the new realities of professional education in public health in the twenty-first century. This article presents processes for implementing and evaluating a revised public health curriculum and lessons learned from this initiative
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.