Abstract

ABSTRACT In the northern Great Lakes States, seepage lakes are considered more vulnerable to acidification than drainage lakes. The ILWAS model, which was developed for drainage lakes in the Adirondack Mountain Region of New York, has been revised for use in seepage lake systems. Contrasts were observed between the Wisconsin seepage lakes and the drainage lakes in the Adirondack Region of New York. (1) Atmospheric loading of hydrogen and sulfate ions was 77 and 62 percent respectively, lower in Wisconsin. (2) In contrast to the low alkalinity flow-through lakes in the Adirondacks, there are no observed spring pH depressions associated with snowmelt in Wisconsin seepage lakes. (3) Because of deep glacial deposits (32–190 m) at the Wisconsin sites, a longer contact time between groundwater and weatherable minerals provides a substantial buffering capacity via silicate hydrolysis. (4) Inlake alkalinity production by bacterial sulfate reduction in the sediments of Wisconsin seepage lakes plays a significant r...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call