Abstract

The evaluation of localized soil-liquefaction potential is based primarily on the individual evaluation of the liquefaction potential in each borehole, followed by calculating the liquefaction-potential index between boreholes through Kriging interpolation, and then plotting the liquefaction-potential map. However, misjudgments in design, construction, and operation may occur due to the complexity and uncertainty of actual geologic structures. In this study, the coupled Markov chain (CMC) method was used to create and analyze stratigraphic profiles and to grid the stratum between each borehole so that the stratum consisted of several virtual boreholes. The soil-layer parameters were established using homogenous and random field models, and the subsequent liquefaction-potential-evaluation results were compared with those derived using the Kriging method. The findings revealed that within the drilling data range in this study, the accuracy of the CMC model in generating stratigraphic profiles was greater than that of the Kriging method. Additionally, if the CMC method incorporated with random field parameters were to be used in engineering practice, we recommend that after calculating the curve of the mean, the COV should be set to 0.25 as a conservative estimation of the liquefaction-potential interval that considers the evaluation results of the Kriging method.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call