Abstract

Introduction The discovery of novel bronchodilators that treat human respiratory disorders has been guided by an array of animal models of bronchoconstriction which differ in technical complexity and experimental endpoints. Here, we apply methodology in which ventilation pressure provides a surrogate measure of airway tone (Einthoven, 1892) to assess the potency and duration of muscarinic antagonists and β 2-adrenergic agonists in two rodent species. The purpose of this study was to validate the Einthoven model of bronchoconstriction by testing two classes of bronchodilators that are approved for clinical use. Methods Conscious guinea pigs or rats, placed in an inhalation chamber, were dosed by nebulization with vehicle or test compound. Prior to testing, animals were anesthetized, tracheotomized and artificially ventilated. Changes in ventilation pressure were measured via a pressure transducer. Guinea pigs were challenged with doses of methacholine (1–32 μg/kg, i.v.) or histamine (1–64 μg/kg, i.v.) and rats were challenged with an infusion of methacholine (5–80 μg/kg, i.v.). Changes in ventilation pressure (cm H 2O) were calculated as peak post-challenge ventilation pressure − peak baseline ventilation pressure. The potency [ID 50, nebulizer concentration] and duration of bronchoprotective activity of ipratropium, tiotropium, albuterol, salmeterol and indacaterol were determined. Results In guinea pig, ipratropium [ID 50 = 5.7 μg/mL] and tiotropium [ID 50 = 5.4 μg/mL] were equipotent, whereas albuterol [ID 50 = 117 μg/mL], was 65-fold and 23-fold less potent than salmeterol [ID 50 = 1.8 μg/mL] and indacaterol [ID 50 = 5.2 μg/mL], respectively. Only tiotropium and indacaterol exhibited 24 h bronchoprotection. In the rat, ipratropium [ID 50 = 4.4 μg/mL] and tiotropium [6.0 μg/mL] were equipotent. The bronchoprotective duration of tiotropium in the rat was ≥ 24 h. Discussion The Einthoven model accurately determined the rank order of potency and duration of clinically used bronchodilators. The decreased experimental variability and reproducibility associated with the methodology of Einthoven model may offer significant advantages over other models of bronchoconstriction and thereby support the discovery of novel bronchodilators.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.