Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is increasingly used for identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures. Pretreatments to effectively remove non-bacterial components and selectively collect microorganisms are a prerequisite for successful identification, and a variety of home-brew and commercial protocols have been reported. Although commercially available kits, mainly the Sepsityper Kit, are increasingly used, the identification rates reported often are not satisfactory, particularly for Gram-positive isolates. We recently developed a method to collect bacteria from positive blood culture bottles using a polyallylamine-polystyrene copolymer that has been used in wastewater processing. This pretreatment protocol is now commercially available as the rapid BACpro® II kit (Nittobo Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan). The operation time required for processing using this novel kit is approximately 10 min, and the entire procedure can be completed within a biosafety cabinet.Since the performance of the rapid BACpro® II kit has not been tested using the MALDI Biotyper system, we prospectively evaluated the performance of the rapid BACpro® II kit as compared with the Sepsityper® kit.Performance of the rapid BACpro® II kit was evaluated using a total of 193 monomicrobial cases of positive blood culture. Medium from blood culture bottles was pretreated by the rapid BACpro® II kit or the Sepsityper® Kit, and isolated cells were subjected to direct identification by MS fingerprinting in parallel with conventional subculturing for reference identification. The overall MALDI-TOF MS-based identification rates with >1.7 score and >2.0 score obtained using the rapid BACpro® II kit were 99.5% and 80.8%, respectively, whereas those obtained using the Sepsityper® Kit were 89.1% and 68.4%, respectively (P < 0.05 for >1.7 and P < 0.05 for >2.0 by Pearsons's chi-square). In Gram-positive cases, the rapid BACpro® II kit gave identification rate of 100% with >1.7 score and 69.4% with >2.0 score, whereas there were 84.7% and 56.8%, respectively by the Sepsityper® Kit (P < 0.05 for >1.7).These results are preliminary, but considering that this new kit is easy to perform and the identification rates are promising, the rapid BACpro® II kit deserves assessment in a larger-scale study with a variety of platforms for MS-based bacterial identification.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call