Abstract

The existence of baseline data on the spectrum of thyroid nodules in Bhutanese patients is unknown. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is regarded as the gold standard diagnostic test for pre-op assessment of thyroid lesions. We conducted a retrospective study, involving 765 patients who underwent FNAC of the thyroid gland, at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, between January-2018 to December-2020. We aimed to assess the cytomorphological spectrum of thyroid nodules, classify them as per The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC), assess risk of malignancy (ROM), and evaluate the accuracy of FNAC in diagnosing thyroid malignancy. Colloid nodule (37.4%) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (4.2%) constituted the majority of benign and malignant cytological diagnoses, respectively. According to TBSRTC, majority of the cases (82.0%) fell under the Bethesda II category. Bethesda III was the least common (1.4%) category. As compared to histopathological diagnosis; the sensitivity, specificity, positive and the negative predictive values of FNAC in diagnosing thyroid malignancy were 90.0%, 93.3%, 93.10%, and 90.32% respectively. The ROM increased concurrently with the grade of the Bethesda category and was more or less close to the ROM reference range, published in the TBSRTC. Benign thyroid nodules (82.0%) constituted a majority of thyroid nodules in Bhutanese patients. FNAC was found to be reliable in detecting thyroid malignancy. From the literature, TBSRTC was found to be a more convenient method for reporting thyroid cytology. Henceforth, as most institutes, we plan to implement TBSRTC for reporting thyroid cytopathology.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.