Abstract

Wind erosion dust suppressant is an effective measure for controlling wind erosion dust. This study used the Portable In-Situ Wind Erosion Laboratory (PI-SWERL) to evaluate the efficiency of domestic and foreign dust suppressants and to compare their control efficiency of PM2.5 in terms of spraying methods, dilution factors, and wind speed. The following results were noted.① According to the recommended dilution factor, G and Enviroseal (ES) dust suppressant solutions were treated and tested, respectively. The control efficiency of particulate matter with diameters less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) corresponding to the droplet spraying method was better than the atomized spraying method; the G dust suppressant efficiency, at 99.5%, was better than ES and water, at 94.0% and 77.5%, respectively, at 17.2 m·s-1, which is equivalent to grade 8 wind. ② The G dust suppressant with dilution factors of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 400 times was tested. The dust suppression efficiency at a wind speed of 17.2 m·s-1 was 99.7%, 99.5%, 99.7%, 98.1%, and 95.9%, respectively. The best cost-effective dilution factor of G dust suppressant was 150 times. The efficiency of dust suppressants increased when the wind speed increased between 13.1 m·s-1 and 17.2 m·s-1. ③ The method of using PI-SWERL to test the efficiency of wind erosion dust suppressant can quantify the suppression efficiency of dust suppressant on PM2.5. It is recommended to conduct dust suppression during effective periods and to practice environmentally friendly methods of wind erosion dust suppression.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call