Abstract

BackgroundTralokinumab is an anti–interleukin (IL)-13 monoclonal antibody investigated for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma in two Phase III clinical trials, STRATOS 1 and 2. The STRATOS 1 biomarker analysis plan was developed to identify biomarker(s) indicative of IL-13 activation likely to predict tralokinumab efficacy and define a population in which there was an enhanced treatment effect; this defined population was then tested in STRATOS 2.MethodsThe biomarkers considered were blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), serum dipeptidyl peptidase-4, serum periostin and total serum immunoglobulin E. Tralokinumab efficacy was measured as the reduction in annualised asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) compared with placebo (primary endpoint measure of STRATOS 1 and 2). The biomarker analysis plan included negative binomial and generalised additive models, and the Subgroup Identification based on Differential Effect Search (SIDES) algorithm, supported by robustness and sensitivity checks. Effects on the key secondary endpoints of STRATOS 1 and 2, which included changes from baseline in standard measures of asthma outcomes, were also investigated. Prior to the STRATOS 1 read-out, numerous simulations of the methodology were performed with hypothetical data.ResultsFeNO and periostin were identified as the only biomarkers potentially predictive of treatment effect, with cut-offs chosen by the SIDES algorithm of > 32.3 ppb and > 27.4 ng/ml, respectively. The FeNO > 32.3 ppb subgroup was associated with greater AAER reductions and improvements in key secondary endpoints compared with the periostin > 27.4 ng/ml subgroup. Upon further evaluation of AAER reductions at different FeNO cut-offs, ≥37 ppb was chosen as the best cut-off for predicting tralokinumab efficacy.DiscussionA rigorous statistical approach incorporating multiple methods was used to investigate the predictive properties of five potential biomarkers and to identify a participant subgroup that demonstrated an enhanced tralokinumab treatment effect. Using STRATOS 1 data, our analyses identified FeNO at a cut-off of ≥37 ppb as the best assessed biomarker for predicting enhanced treatment effect to be tested in STRATOS 2. Our findings were inconclusive, which reflects the complexity of subgroup identification in the severe asthma population.Trial registrationSTRATOS 1 and 2 are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02161757 registered on June 12, 2014, and NCT02194699 registered on July 18, 2014).

Highlights

  • Tralokinumab is an anti–interleukin (IL)-13 monoclonal antibody investigated for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma in two Phase III clinical trials, STRATOS 1 and 2

  • Whilst the best fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) cut-off we identified using Subgroup Identification based on Differential Effect Search (SIDES) was > 32.3 ppb, upon further investigation of the tralokinumab effect on asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) reduction and secondary endpoints we established the subgroup defined by a cut-off of ≥37 ppb as the best choice

  • We describe the use of a rigorous approach using multiple statistical methods to identify a biomarker that most effectively identified a subgroup with an enhanced tralokinumab treatment effect in STRATOS 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tralokinumab is an anti–interleukin (IL)-13 monoclonal antibody investigated for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma in two Phase III clinical trials, STRATOS 1 and 2. Post-hoc analyses indicated enhanced benefits in participants with evidence of IL-13 axis activation, assessed by elevated serum concentrations of periostin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), which are biomarkers induced by IL-13 [13]. The data from these two Phase II trials suggested that tralokinumab would only be effective in severe asthma when there was evidence of IL-13 activation. This concept was supported by data from clinical trials of another anti–IL-13 mAb, lebrikizumab [14, 15] It was consistent with emerging evidence that underlying patterns of airway inflammation, and response to treatment, vary among people with severe asthma [16]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call