Abstract

Performance evaluation of miscible and near-miscible gas injection processes is available through conventional finite difference (FD) compositional simulation. Streamline methods have also been developed in which fluid is transported along the streamlines instead of using the finite difference grid. In streamline-based simulation, a 3D flow problem is decoupled into a set of 1D problems solved along streamlines. This reduces simulation time relative to FD simulation, and suppresses the numerical dispersion errors that are present in FD simulations. Larger time steps and higher spatial resolution can be achieved in these simulations. Thus, streamline-based reservoir simulation can be orders of magnitude faster than the conventional finite difference methods. Streamline methods are traditionally only applied to incompressible flow processes. In this paper, the method is adopted and assessed for application to compressible flow processes. A detailed comparison is given between the results of conventional FD simulation and the streamline approach for gas displacement processes. Finally, some guidelines are given on how the streamline method can potentially be used to good effect for gas displacement processes.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Thesis rationaleThe production of oil from most commercially viable reservoirs is generally described by three stages termed natural recovery, supplementary recovery and enhanced recovery processes

  • The results showed significant reduction in computational efficiency by reducing 3D compositional flow to 1D equation using diffusive time of flight’ (DTOF) as spatial coordinate

  • The flow transport along a streamline only involved in solving the component for wave speeds, with each velocity as it is allowing to calculate the volume associated with a streamline as the product of time of flight times the flow rate along the streamline [38]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The production of oil from most commercially viable reservoirs is generally described by three stages termed natural recovery, supplementary recovery and enhanced recovery processes. It is worth noting that the use of enhanced methods without the use of supplementary methods may well still improve the overall recovery factor in the field after the primary recovery method has been either physically or economically exhausted. Natural reservoir energy forces oil to the producing wells but with a decrease in the reservoir pressure. Due to this decrease in the reservoir pressure, the new in situ reservoir pressure may drop below the bubble point pressure, whereby dissolved gases are released from the oil [12][2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call