Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive, integrated theory for explaining social responsibility disclosures. The relevant theory applied is Ullmann's (1985) three dimensional model of social responsibility disclosure. The research question asked is: Can Ullmann's stakeholder theory be operationalized to help explain the quantity and quality of environmental disclosures in annual reports in a voluntary reporting setting? Quantity is measured by the number of sentences devoted to environmental issues reported in the annual report while quality of disclosures is measured by a index scored by users of financial statements with financial reporting qualifications. Both quantity of disclosure and quality of disclosure are highly correlated. The sample consists of 102 of the largest companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange. Ordinary least squares regression is used to determine if variables selected to measure stakeholder power, strategic posture and economic performance are significant in explaining the quantity and quality of environment disclosures in annuals reports. The stakeholder power dimension of Ullmann's framework measured by shareholder, regulator and lobby groups is significant in explaining environmental disclosures. The strategic posture dimension of Ullmann's model measured by content of the mission statement and existence or otherwise of environmental or social responsibility committees also find strong statistically significant support in the results. The third dimension of economic performance is not supported by the results. Consistent with prior studies, size is found to be a significant predictor of disclosure practices.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call