Application of Risk-Informed Methods to Improve Plant Operation at Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant

Abstract

Refueling outages at the Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) Units 5 and 6 are used to perform annual repairs and preventive maintenance activities, piping inspections, and test activities. A refueling outage at KNPP typically requires 60 days and occurs on an annual basis. Testing of safety systems at the KNPP Units 5 and 6 is an extensive exercise that results in multiple actuations of all components during each test and a relatively high number of component actuations each year. This results in equipment wear out issues that can lead to considerable component replacement and/or refurbishment. Numerous piping in-service inspections are conducted in locations where there has been no industry or plant-specific indications or failures, leading to unnecessary personnel exposure. KNPP is interested in using risk-informed (RI) approaches to reduce refueling outage length, piping inspections, testing, and exposure. KNPP is a four-loop Voda-Vodyanoi Energetichesky Reaktor (VVER) with a power level of 1000 MWe. Safety systems consist of three trains. The KNPP at-power probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) model includes internal and external events. It addresses the full range of events leading to core damage frequency (CDF) and includes a simplified level 2 model leading to large early release frequency (LERF). The RI approach, as defined in the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC’s) risk-informed (RI) Regulatory Guides (RGs) 1.174, 1.177, and 1.178, was used in this program. The specific approach used for risk-informed in-service inspection (RI-ISI) is based on the Pressurized Water Reactor Owner’s Group methodology. The overall approach for each of the three applications used a multi-step process which included the following: identification of systems to address; identification of alternatives to current maintenance, inspection, and testing practices; a risk assessment of the proposed alternatives; an assessment of the impact of the changes on deterministic considerations; identification of monitoring requirements; and an assessment of the economic benefits. The RI-ISI program also considered the impact of the changes on personnel exposure. The overall approach made extensive use of data assessments, reliability methods, and risk assessments. The results demonstrated that the proposed changes in maintenance, in-service inspection, and testing programs have a small impact on risk, based on CDF and LERF. In addition, the proposed changes provide significant benefits in terms of reduced outage time, in-service inspections, testing requirements, and personnel exposure. The economic analysis demonstrated that changes to the maintenance program provide the largest benefit followed by the changes to the in-service inspection program and then the changes to the testing program.