Abstract

Forest canopy height is an important biophysical variable for quantifying carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. Active light detection and ranging (lidar) sensors with discrete-return or waveform lidar have produced reliable measures of forest canopy height. However, rigorous procedures are required for an accurate estimation, especially when using waveform lidar, since backscattered signals are likely distorted by topographic conditions within the footprint. Based on extracted waveform parameters, we explore how well a physical slope correction approach performs across different footprint sizes and study sites. The data are derived from airborne (Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor; LVIS) and spaceborne (Geoscience Laser Altimeter System; GLAS) lidar campaigns. Comparisons against field measurements show that LVIS data can satisfactorily provide a proxy for maximum forest canopy heights (n = 705, RMSE = 4.99 m, and R2 = 0.78), and the simple slope correction grants slight accuracy advancement in the LVIS canopy height retrieval (RMSE of 0.39 m improved). In the same vein of the LVIS with relatively smaller footprint size (~20 m), substantial progress resulted from the physically-based correction for the GLAS (footprint size = ~50 m). When compared against reference LVIS data, RMSE and R2 for the GLAS metrics (n = 527) are improved from 12.74–7.83 m and from 0.54–0.63, respectively. RMSE of 5.32 m and R2 of 0.80 are finally achieved without 38 outliers (n = 489). From this study, we found that both LVIS and GLAS lidar campaigns could be benefited from the physical correction approach, and the magnitude of accuracy improvement was determined by footprint size and terrain slope.

Highlights

  • Forest ecosystems are a substantial carbon sink, biodiversity reservoir, and driver of microclimate and ecological processes [1,2,3,4]

  • This study provided uncorrected Hmax values for LVIS and Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) data to show the level of slope effects and accuracy improvements using the slope correction approach

  • We evaluated the agreement between LVIS and field estimates using four statistical metrics: bias, mean-absolute-errors (MAE), RMSE and coefficient of determination (R2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest ecosystems are a substantial carbon sink, biodiversity reservoir, and driver of microclimate and ecological processes [1,2,3,4]. Improvements in remote sensing techniques have addressed this challenge by using active or passive sensors that are sensitive to the structural attributes of forests [1,5,6]. The passive system in optical remote sensing has produced biophysical estimations for Leaf Area Index (LAI), biomass, gross primary productivity, and net primary productivity (e.g., [7,8,9,10]). These measures are only derived from theoretical conjugations between forest structures and indirect observations (i.e., surface reflection, absorption, and re-emission of solar radiation). Active sensors (light detection and ranging (lidar) or radio detection and ranging (radar)) have become more attractive to the remote sensing community because they overcome some constraints of the passive system [11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call