Abstract

This study’s aim was to apply permutation entropy (PE) and permutation min-entropy (PME) over an RR interval time series to quantify the changes in cardiac activity among multiple emotional states. Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals were recorded under six emotional states (neutral, happiness, sadness, anger, fear, and disgust) in 60 healthy subjects at a rate of 1000 Hz. For each emotional state, ECGs were recorded for 5 min and the RR interval time series was extracted from these ECGs. The obtained results confirm that PE and PME increase significantly during the emotional states of happiness, sadness, anger, and disgust. Both symbolic quantifiers also increase but not in a significant way for the emotional state of fear. Moreover, it is found that PME is more sensitive than PE for discriminating non-neutral from neutral emotional states.

Highlights

  • Emotion recognition by using physiological signals, including electroencephalogram (EEG) [1], photoplethysmography (PPG) [2], skin temperature [3], and electrocardiogram (ECG) [4], has attracted increasing attention

  • permutation min-entropy (PME) appears be more sensitive of fortheir andrandomness

  • Previous studies showing that other associated RR interval (RRI) time series

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Emotion recognition by using physiological signals, including electroencephalogram (EEG) [1], photoplethysmography (PPG) [2], skin temperature [3], and electrocardiogram (ECG) [4], has attracted increasing attention. Time-domain and frequency-domain indices were conventionally used for emotional state recognition. Guo et al [5] applied time-domain indices, mean, coefficient of variation of RR intervals, standard deviation of the RR intervals, and standard deviation of the successive differences of the RR intervals together with a support vector machine classifier, reaching 50.3% of correct rate to discriminate negative and positive emotional states. Kim et al [6] used spectrum, amplitude, mean, maximum, and standard deviation together with a support vector machine classifier to achieve an accuracy of 61.8%

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.