Abstract

The structural characterization of clusters or nanoparticles is essential to rationalize their size and composition-dependent properties. As experiments alone could not provide complete picture of cluster structures, so independent theoretical investigations are needed to find out a detail description of the geometric arrangement and corresponding properties of the clusters. The potential energy surfaces (PES) are explored to find several minima with an ultimate goal of locating the global minima (GM) for the clusters. Optimization algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA), basin hopping method and its variants, self-consistent basin-to-deformed-basin mapping, heuristic algorithm combined with the surface and interior operators (HA-SIO), fast annealing evolutionary algorithm (FAEA), random tunneling algorithm (RTA), and dynamic lattice searching (DLS) have been developed to solve the geometrical isomers in pure elemental clusters. Various model or empirical potentials (EPs) as Lennard–Jones (LJ), Born–Mayer, Gupta, Sutton–Chen, and Murrell–Mottram potentials are used to describe the bonding in different type of clusters. Due to existence of a large number of homotops in nanoalloys, genetic algorithm, basin-hopping algorithm, modified adaptive immune optimization algorithm (AIOA), evolutionary algorithm (EA), kick method and Knowledge Led Master Code (KLMC) are also used. In this review the optimization algorithms, computational techniques and accuracy of results obtained by using these mechanisms for different types of clusters will be discussed.

Highlights

  • Application of Optimization Algorithms in ClustersBioinformatics, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India. Reviewed by: William Tiznado, Andres Bello University, Chile Wensheng Cai, Nankai University, China

  • Nanoclusters are considered as a collection of ∼10 to 106 atoms or molecules within a nanometre size range (Lesley and Johnston, 2000; Johnston, 2002) such as fullerenes, metal clusters, molecular clusters and ionic clusters (Jellinek, 1999; Baletto and Ferrando, 2005)

  • OGOLEM (Hartke, 1993; Dieterich and Hartke, 2017), GMIN (Wales and Scheraga, 1999; Wales, 2010), Birmingham Cluster Genetic Algorithm (BCGA) (Johnston, 2003; Shayeghi et al, 2015), Gradient Embedded Genetic Algorithm or GEGA (Alexandrova and Boldyrev, 2005), Global Reaction Route Mapping (GRRM) (Ohno and Maeda, 2006; Ohno and Maeda, 2019), Evolutionary Algorithm for Molecular Clusters or EA_MOL (Llanio-Trujillo et al, 2011; Marques and Pereira, 2011), Automated Mechanisms and Kinetics (AutoMeKin) (Martínez-Núñez, 2015a; Martínez-Núñez, 2015b; MartínezNúñez et al, 2020), ABCluster (Zhang and Dolg, 2015), Genetic Algorithm fitting (GAFit) (Rodríguez-Fernández et al, 2017; Rodríguez-Fernández et al, 2020), AUTOMATON (Yañez et al, 2019; Yañez et al, 2020) and NWPEsSe (Zhang et al, 2020) are some of the computational tools which have included many of these methods

Read more

Summary

Application of Optimization Algorithms in Clusters

Bioinformatics, CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India. Reviewed by: William Tiznado, Andres Bello University, Chile Wensheng Cai, Nankai University, China. The potential energy surfaces (PES) are explored to find several minima with an ultimate goal of locating the global minima (GM) for the clusters. Optimization algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA), basin hopping method and its variants, self-consistent basin-to-deformed-basin mapping, heuristic algorithm combined with the surface and interior operators (HA-SIO), fast annealing evolutionary algorithm (FAEA), random tunneling algorithm (RTA), and dynamic lattice searching (DLS) have been developed to solve the geometrical isomers in pure elemental clusters. In this review the optimization algorithms, computational techniques and accuracy of results obtained by using these mechanisms for different types of clusters will be discussed

INTRODUCTION
Optimization Algorithms in Clusters
PURE METALLIC CLUSTERS
Bimetallic Clusters
Trimetallic and Tetrametallic Clusters
DIPOLAR CLUSTERS
ENERGY LANDSCAPE FOR KAGOME LATTICE FROM SOFT ANISOTROPIC PARTICLES
ENERGY LANDSCAPE FOR PLANAR COLLOIDAL SYSTEMS
ENERGY LANDSCAPES FOR WATER DIMER
ENERGY LANDSCAPES OF HYDRATED SULFATE CLUSTERS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call