Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
Application of stable transition metal isotopes as indicators of ore genesis is becoming more popular, yet the fractionation mechanisms and isotopic distribution in these unconventional systems remain poorly understood. In this study, we present an analysis of sulphide Ni, Cu and Fe isotopes measured from solution using multicollector ICP-MS. The data were collected from the dominant sulphide phases in the Raja prospect within the epigenetic-hydrothermal Rajapalot AuCo deposit, Finnish Lapland. Our main goal was to gain new information on the systematics and behaviour of the isotopes in high-temperature ore-forming environments, with implications for ore genesis. The Raja prospect is hosted by a Paleoproterozoic volcanic-sedimentary sequence and was formed by multi-stage hydrothermal processes during the Svecofennian orogeny. Pyrite shows significant variation in δ56Fe (-2.08 to +3.29 ‰), including the heaviest iron isotopes thus far observed in natural pyrite. The δ56Fe values in pyrrhotite vary less (-0.74 to +0.80 ‰) but are unusually heavy compared to those of magmatic pyrrhotite. δ56Fe in chalcopyrite ranges from +0.10 to +1.45 ‰, δ60Ni in pyrrhotite from -1.03 to +0.18 ‰, and δ65Cu in chalcopyrite from -0.30 to +0.23 ‰. The δ56Fe values in co-existing sulphide phases suggest both equilibrium and kinetic fractionation effects. The extreme Fe fractionation in pyrite implies that kinetic fractionation played a major role in the precipitation of isotopically light pyrite. Moreover, inheritance of low δ56Fe values from a pyrrhotite precursor is likely. The heavy Fe isotopic composition of some of the pyrrhotite and pyrite is probably the result of preferential leaching of light isotopes by late hydrothermal fluids.Systematic correlations between the composition of the examined isotope systems, Co and Au concentrations, and textural features link the sulphide isotopes to multi-stage ore formation. Gradual trends in the isotope compositions suggest Rayleigh fractionation. Early Co deposition is attributed to isotopically heavy fluid, probably derived from a sedimentary formation with abundant iron oxides. The isotopically lighter Au mineralising fluids point to a separate fluid source, probably involving evolved granites. The late hydrothermal Au-carrying fluids overprinted the early Co mineralisation forming AuCo enriched zones. Our study highlights the potential of multiple isotope systematics in sulphides as a useful diagnostic tool for tracing mineralisation processes in and source regions of hydrothermal Au and Co.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
